Selecting a suitable emergency landing site is a critical decision for any pilot facing engine failure. While airports are the preferred option, other environments must often be considered. This discussion evaluates the relative risks associated with three primary off-airport landing surfaces: open land, roads, water, and wooded areas. Key considerations include survivability rates and the likelihood of fatal, serious, or minor injuries based on FAA and NTSB data.
Understanding Injury Categories in Aviation Accidents
Injury outcomes are classified into three categories for analysis. Fatal injuries include any death occurring at the scene or within 30 days of the accident. Serious injuries involve more than two days of hospitalization, major fractures (excluding minor ones such as fingers or toes), internal injuries, or significant burns. Minor injuries result in less than two days of hospitalization and typically involve less severe trauma. These classifications are consistent with FAA and NTSB definitions and are used to compare different types of forced landings.
Open Land: High Survivability, Minimal Fatal Risk
Open land, including fields, beaches, and level terrain, presents one of the safest options for emergency landings when airports are unavailable. Of 216 studied incidents involving land landings, 16% resulted in serious injuries, and 20% in minor injuries, with only one recorded fatality. When the surface was an open field, the serious injury rate dropped to 14%. These findings indicate that open land offers a relatively high probability of survival, particularly when the terrain is flat and free of obstructions.
Roads — Accessible but Hazard-Prone
Roads are a commonly selected option for emergency landings, though data suggests they carry additional hazards such as power lines, overpasses, traffic, and signage. In the 27 reportable road landings analyzed, 40% resulted in serious injuries and 22% in minor injuries. No fatalities were reported. However, successful road landings without damage to persons or property typically go unreported, as they do not meet NTSB criteria for inclusion. Therefore, available data likely represents the higher-risk end of the spectrum. Visibility, direction of traffic, and potential obstructions should be carefully considered if a road is selected.
Water: High Survival Rates with Key Considerations
Water ditchings show a relatively high survival rate of over 90%, depending on proximity to shore and post-landing swim conditions. Rivers are considered safer than open ocean due to shorter swim distances and easier access to rescue. Key survival strategies include removing shoes and propping open doors prior to impact to facilitate egress. Survival rates drop slightly in blue water environments (e.g., open ocean), with an 82% success rate noted. The primary risks involve post-impact evacuation and hypothermia or drowning, not the impact itself.
Trees: The Highest Injury Risk Due to Abrupt Deceleration
Landings in wooded areas carry the highest injury risk among non-airport options. Of the cases reviewed, approximately 35% resulted in serious injuries, with a total injury rate (including minor injuries) around 60%. Outcomes vary significantly depending on tree type, density, and terrain. Pine forests with uniform rows may allow limited maneuvering, while dense or uneven forests increase the risk of an abrupt stop. Trees are more likely to produce high deceleration forces, which significantly increase the potential for injury during impact.
Summary of Emergency Landing Surface Outcomes
Based on the available data, the relative safety of emergency landing surfaces can be summarized as follows:
- Open fields: Low fatality rate, moderate injury risk, highest overall survivability
- Roads: Moderate injury risk, no fatalities in reported incidents, but elevated hazard potential due to obstructions
- Water: High survivability if proper ditching technique and exit strategies are applied
- Trees: Highest combined injury rate, highly dependent on terrain and forest density
Pilots are encouraged to maintain constant awareness of nearby landing options and to mentally rehearse potential emergency scenarios during flight. Selecting the most suitable terrain can greatly reduce the likelihood of serious outcomes in the event of engine failure.
Whether operating as a private pilot, commercial pilot, or certified flight instructor, understanding the tradeoffs between trees, water, roads, and land during an in-flight emergency is essential. Training for engine-out scenarios and practicing decision-making under pressure contributes to greater safety and better outcomes. This knowledge reinforces critical judgment skills in both airplane and instrument rating scenarios.
Start a Free Two-Week Trial at MzeroA
Love our videos and eager to learn more? Are you passionate about aviation, or curious to learn how to fly? Now’s the perfect time to explore further – with a 2-week FREE trial of MzeroA’s Online Ground School. Take that “Discovery Flight” into MzeroA’s courses to see if we are the right fit for you!