This accident analysis examines how critical fuel decisions influenced a tragic multi-engine event involving a Beechcraft Baron. Jason Schappert reviews each link in the error chain and highlights key lessons on planning, procedures, and energy management.
Engine Failure on Approach
During an IFR GPS approach, both engines lost power within ten seconds. The left engine regained near-full power forty seconds later, but the right engine remained inoperative. The pilot did not raise the flaps or feather the right propeller, contrary to emergency procedures. The aircraft descended below a 500-foot ceiling with airspeed dropping under VMC, creating a hazardous configuration.
VMC Conditions and Loss of Control
The unfeathered propeller produced significant drag. The left engine remained near full power with an aft center of gravity. These combined factors created a turning tendency toward the inoperative engine. The aircraft eventually rolled and entered a spin. The NTSB summarizes similar accidents in the NTSB Accident Database, reinforcing the importance of proper single-engine control.
The Fuel Planning Breakdown
The pilot’s flight plan called for at least 58 gallons of fuel. Logs recovered later indicated only 50 to 54 gallons on board. This amount did not meet the minimum requirements for the approach or any alternative. The aircraft also carried five passengers, placing the Baron above its maximum gross weight even before additional fuel. These critical fuel decisions created a foundation for the later emergency.
Incorrect Fuel Assumptions
Surveillance footage revealed the pilot attempted to top off the airplane days earlier, but fuel was never added. The pilot then relied on fuel gauges and misprogrammed engine monitoring systems based on incorrect assumptions. During preflight, only the left tank was visually checked. The right tank, which would have revealed inadequate fuel, remained unchecked.
Importance of a Complete Preflight
Jason stresses that a thorough preflight applies even when an aircraft just returned from a lesson or flight. Hidden damage or low fuel may exist despite a recent landing. Treating every aircraft as unfamiliar helps reduce complacency. Structural checks, fuel quantity verification, and system awareness must remain consistent.
The Three-Hour Rule
Jason also discusses the three-hour rule. The timer begins at “clear prop” and ends at shutdown. This rule encourages planning legs of about two and a half hours, ensuring arrival with at least ninety minutes of fuel on board. Proper endurance planning reduces stress, prevents rushed decisions, and promotes safer outcomes during high-workload phases.
Lessons from the Event
This analysis highlights the impact of critical fuel decisions and procedural discipline. Proper fuel planning, consistent preflight habits, and correct multi-engine procedures form essential layers of safety. Understanding each link in the chain allows pilots to recognize risk factors and prevent similar outcomes.Start a Free Two-Week Trial at MzeroA
Start a Free Two-Week Trial at MzeroA
Love our videos and eager to learn more? Are you passionate about aviation, or curious to learn how to fly? Now’s the perfect time to explore further – with a 2-week FREE trial of MzeroA’s Online Ground School. Take that “Discovery Flight” into MzeroA’s courses to see if we are the right fit for you!